So far, we have talked about subgroups being either normal or not normal, but there is a refinement of not normal groups called subnormal. A subgroup H is subnormal if it is not normal in G, but in a string of nested subgroups ending in G, each one normal in the supergroup directly above it.
We just started talking about the quaternion group, an eight element non-abelian group where all the subgroups are normal. The other eight element non-abelian group we have discussed is D4, the symmetries of the square. The order of a subgroup has to divide the order of the group, so the only possible sizes of subgroups of a group of order 8 are 4, 2 and 1. In D4, the 8 element subgroup is the group itself, and the only subgroup of order 1 is the identity. While normality can be difficult to prove in some cases, one of the easiest cases is that if a group has order 2n, and subgroup of order n is normal. This means all the subgroups of order 4 must be normal, but we have to check on each of the subgroups of order 2. It turns out some are not normal, but if we look at them as 2 element subgroups of a group of order 4, they must be normal because 2 is half of 4.
Commentary
I am learning about subnormality on the fly as I put it up on the blog. D4 is a subgroup of S4, but it is not normal or subnormal, since subgroups of a symmetric group must be a union of conjugacy classes. Written in cycle notation, D4 looks like this.
Rotations: (1), (1234), (13)(24), (1423)
Reflections: (12)(34), (14)(23), (13), (24)
Because the symmetric group has 24 elements and the dihedral group has 8, there is no subgroup "between" them, because there is no number between 8 and 24 that is divisible by 8 and also divides 24. D4 is not normal in S4 because it doesn't include all the 4-cycles and doesn't include all the 2-cycles. The chain of subgroups that defines subnormality is supposed to go all the way up to the group itself, and this is not the case here.
I expect there is a name for such a situation since it can be found so easily using well known small finite groups. I will search for it over the next few weeks, and I hope to report back.
In any case, learning new stuff is fun, but I fully expect I am reinventing the wheel here. It wouldn't be the first time.
No comments:
Post a Comment